Contract · Federal · No Set aside used
Collaborative Testing Services (CTS) Proficiency Testing Supplies
- Agency
- DEPT OF DEFENSE / DEFENSE HEALTH AGENCY (DHA)
- Location
- Dover AFB, DE
- Amount
- Amount not listed
- Posted
- Sep 9, 2026
- Set-aside
- No Set aside used
- NAICS code
- 334516 look up NAICS codes
- PSC code
- 6550
Timeline
-
Posted
Sep 9, 2026
-
Status
Closing soon
What contracts like this typically pay
No award history yet for this category (NAICS 334516).
What this contract is for
- Agency
- DEPT OF DEFENSE / DEFENSE HEALTH AGENCY (DHA)
- Location
- Dover AFB, DE
- Set-aside
- No Set aside used
- NAICS
- 334516
- Scope
- Federal
This notice announces the intent by the Defense Health Agency Contracting Activity (DHACA) Fort Detrick, Maryland, 21702, to award a sole source Firm-Fixed-Price (FFP) Contract to Collaborative Testing Services (CTS) under the statutory authority 12.102(a).
The contract is for the purchase of Scheduled proficiency tests shipped at specified dates (vendor dependent) to include testing materials (bloodstains, dried body fluid stains, dried saliva samples) for the Armed Forces Medical Examiner System (AFMES), Armed Forces DNA Identification Laboratory (AFDIL).
Collaborative Testing Services, LLC (CTS) is the only responsible source capable of providing the highly specialized proficiency testing supplies and services required to maintain the accreditation and operational integrity of the Armed Forces DNA Identification Laboratory (AFMES/AFDIL).
While four proficiency testing providers are recognized by laboratory accrediting bodies—Collaborative Testing Services, Bode Cellmark Forensics, College of American Pathologists (CAP), and Serological Research Institute (SERI)—comprehensive market research and technical evaluation confirm that only CTS satisfies the agency’s minimum operational, throughput, and scientific requirements.
The remaining three providers present critical technical deficiencies that make them unsuitable for AFDIL’s casework requirements: Bode Cellmark Forensics offers infrequent testing schedules that cannot support AFDIL’s staffing capacity or rolling test intervals; SERI imposes compressed completion windows that are incompatible with the extended processing times required by AFDIL’s advanced testing technologies; and CAP utilizes a manual, scan-based submission process that introduces an unacceptable risk of data transcription errors.
In contrast, CTS unique...
Official solicitation and documents
The full solicitation, any attachments, and the actual submission instructions live on the official listing, not on this page. Oppward summarizes public record data; it does not host or mirror the source documents.
Oppward is an independent service and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by SAM.gov or any government agency. This page is a plain-English summary of public record data; the linked source above is the authoritative listing.
How to bid on this
This is a contract solicitation, not a grant. To bid, you submit a proposal (usually a price and a description of how you would do the work) directly to the government, through the channel the official listing specifies, not through Oppward.
- Make sure your business has an active SAM.gov registration. You cannot be paid on a federal contract without one.
- Read the full solicitation on the official listing above, especially the scope of work, not just this summary. Our guide to reading a solicitation walks through what to look for.
- Check the set-aside listed above and confirm your business actually qualifies for it before you spend time on a proposal. See our guide to set-asides if the category is unfamiliar.
- Submit your proposal by the deadline, using the exact submission method the official listing states. A technically on-time bid sent the wrong way is often treated as late.
Get contracts like this one matched to your business, free.